Sriwijaya for Sale

Pagaruyung Prasasti

Early Indonesian history is limited to cryptic stone inscriptions and outside sources. Only archaeology can fill in the gaps.

What if you held an auction and no one showed up? Thankfully that’s what happened when the Indonesian government tried to auction off cultural heritage dating from the golden age of Indonesia’s Sriwijaya empire.

Maritime experts believe that the shipwreck discovered off the coast of Cirebon, Java in 2004 harks from 10th century Sumatra. And that the story it tells is not the common tale of outsiders coming in, but of an Indonesian kingdom in its prime, dominating a trade network from Arabia to China.

Precious little evidence about the classic Sriwijaya period, recounted in the histories of foreign powers and in widely scattered stone inscriptions, indicates that the Sriwijaya kingdom was not only wealthy beyond compare, but that it was Asia’s hub of cross-cultural learning from the 7th to 10th centuries. The Chinese monk I-Ching, who studied at Sriwijaya for some ten years, described the scene in the late 7th century: “There are more than a thousand Buddhist priests whose minds are bent on study and good works; thier rules and ceremonies are identical with those of India.”

Early in the 20th century, Indonesia’s founding fathers leveraged Sriwijaya in their call for a “National Awakening”. But current government policy turns Sriwijaya into a business proposition. Whereas land-based archaeological sites are studied and conserved by a dedicated research institution under the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, marine sites fall under the Ministry of Fisheries and Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, who contracts private marine salvage operations in exchange for a 50% take on proceeds. So goes the great maritime history of Tanah Air (“Land of Water”).

Last I heard — back in 2005, the Cirebon wreck got especially messy when local police confiscated the salvaged goods mid-operation. Fragile remains of the ship itself — the only example of its kind — were yanked from preservation tanks and locked away in shipping containers. For at least a year. I doubt they fared well…

Anyway, despite outcries from international authorities and the Sultanate of Cirebon, it’s looking likely that this shipload of sunken treasures will soon be scattered to the winds. I’m thinking of a photo project — a final Sriwijaya family portrait, of sorts. Any takers??

See:

Cirebon Palace plans to build museum to house artifacts | The Jakarta Post, 01 May 2010

For Sale: Ancient Treasures Dug From Indonesia’s Seas | reproduced from The Jakarta Globe, 03 May 2010, on the salvage company’s website [photos]

UNESCO chief concerned by auction of ancient artifacts | The Jakarta Post, 05 May 2010

Little Interest in Indonesian Treasure | The Jakarta Globe, 06 May 2010 [photo]

Artifacts auction closed sans bidders | The Jakarta Post, 06 May 2010

Indonesia to Ease Auction Rules to Lure Treasure Bidders | The Jakarta Globe, 09 May 2010 [photo]


Creative Commons License
Sriwijaya for Sale, © Djuna Ivereigh is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Excerpts may be reproduced with credit for DjunaPix Indonesia Photography linked to href=”http://blog.djunapix.com/2010/05/islands/sriwijaya-for-sale/.

Bones of Contention

Bones of Contention was published in Australia's leading science mag, COSMOS

Bones of Contention was published in Australia's leading science mag, COSMOS

“It’s just another day for us,” Thomas Sutikna tells me, boarding a beat-up minibus bound for Middle Earth. He and his team from the Indonesian Center for Archaeology spend their days hunting “hobbits”— extinct, meter-high humans whose remains they discovered in Liang Bua cave on the remote island of Flores in eastern Indonesia. The only thing different about this day is that Sutikna and crew will have 40-some experts peering over their shoulders and into their digs, debating if and how their work should rewrite what it means to be human.

Since the announcement of the new hominid species Homo floresiensis in October 2004, scientists have argued about the implications of a few handfuls of tiny bones. A majority of researchers welcome the Flores fossils as a new species of human. They embrace the view that we are not alone, at least not recently, and that the hallmarks of humanity—big brains atop long legs—stand to be revised. A vocal minority, meanwhile, reject the new species. They say the Flores fossil is one of us, a modern Homo sapiens, albeit diseased and deformed.

The debate got personal at end-2004 when emeritus Professor Teuku Jacob from Indonesia’s Gadjah Mada University borrowed the Liang Bua bones from the Center for Archaeology and debunked Homo floresiensis in the press. Australian Professor Mike Morwood, a partner on the Liang Bua discovery, cried foul on an institutional agreement regarding management of the bones. The brouhaha degraded into “a level of shouting and name-calling that you do not often hear in Indonesia,” Morwood would later report. Most distressing, however, was that the bones were returned to the Center for Archaeology scarred, broken and clumsily repaired. A member of Jacob’s lab confessed that the damage was the result of botched efforts to cast the crumbly remains.

Political fallout led to closure of the Liang Bua dig site for two years. But 2007 has seen a flurry of renewed activity in and around the cave. Sutikna and Morwood returned for their fifth season of excavations while Jacob sent a team to size up local pygmies, claiming they’re the living descendants of hobbits. And after that, Jacob organized an international symposium on paleoanthropology that focused on Flores and climaxed with a field trip to the cave.

Few scientific arenas are as contentious as paleoanthropology—a field plagued by fewer fossils than there are people who study them. Naturally I wondered what would happen when rivals in the hobbit wars converged on Liang Bua. Would researchers compromise? Or convert? And most importantly, would they behave? I tagged along to find out and to get the big picture on the little people of Flores.

Thomas Sutikna sits in a hotel room in Ruteng, his base camp/paleo lab for the Liang Bua dig. A table is stocked with tools of the trade—dental picks, tinctures, toilet paper to wrap fragile specimens. In one corner, boxes overflow with the dusty remains of beaver-sized rats, pygmy Stegodon (an extinct relative of elephants) and a few hundred stone tools awaiting entry in a database. In another corner sits a suitcase that looks overdue for retirement.

“We have a big story with that,” Sutikna explains. It was the suitcase that carried “LB1”, the type specimen of Homo floresiensis, out of Flores and back to his lab in Jakarta. His colleague Wahyu Saptomo joins him in recounting the discovery.

“I had a joke with Mike [Morwood],” says Saptomo. “I told him if that he left for Jakarta, we would find something big.” And sure enough, on the next-to-last day of the 2003 field season, local digger Benyamin Tarus scraped a trowel through damp clay and hit bone. Benyamin called over Wayhu, who in turn called in the bone expert, Rokhus Awe Due.

Rokhus has worked at Flores digs since 1963 and looks like a living fossil in his own right. But he had no trouble scrambling 5.9 meters down into the shored-up mine shaft that the team had dug over the last two months. There he fixed his eyes on a bulging brow ridge and told Wahyu he was “200% certain” they were looking at an archaic human.

The bone was as soft as the clay it was buried in and Thomas knew drastic measures were needed to secure it for excavation. So he scoured Ruteng to buy UHU glue and nail polish remover—every bottle he could find. Thomas rummages through his tinctures and produces a dainty vial of Tokyo Night. “All the people think we’re crazy,” he laughs. But Thomas’ home-brewed hardening agent allowed the team to recover a nearly complete ancient hominid skeleton—one of just a few throughout the world—and deliver it to their “bone lab” at Hotel Sindha. There he and Rokhus and Wahyu stayed up all night, carving at clay with satay sticks. Their operation revealed a tiny skull, no bigger than a jumbo grapefruit.

Rokhus had first reported to Morwood that they had found a young child. But now he saw worn teeth and fused sutures on the skull. He was forced to conclude that this was a tiny adult—about the height of a five-year-old.

“I was stunned.” Morwood recalls for an Australian film crew. He was familiar with the “island rule”, whereby large animals shrink due to limited resources and an absence of predators. “But the mere thought that you could have a species of human undergoing the same processes of evolutionary downsizing was dumbfounding.”

Morwood next went to Australia and met with paleoanthropologist Peter Brown, armed with a tooth found earlier that season. Brown was excited to hear about the skeleton, says Morwood, “but when I pulled out a copy of the tooth, that’s when he got really excited. That’s when he offered to buy me a cup of coffee and I knew I was onto something.”

Morwood and Brown rushed back to Jakarta to meet the field team arriving at the Center for Archaeology, bearing Thomas’ prized suitcase. When they opened it, “It was like Christmas,” Morwood says. “Nobody spoke. But Peter went white—the blood just drained from his face.”

One look at the lower jaw of LB1 and Brown knew this was not Homo sapiens. It had no chin, peculiar teeth, and primitive bony ridges under the incisors, last seen in hominids almost two million years ago. Later he would reconstruct the height of LB1 at just over a meter and its brain capacity at less than 400cc, about the size of a newborn baby’s.

Brown was stumped. “For me the skeleton was in the wrong place—Flores not Africa, and at the wrong time—it should have been more than a million years old.” At first he had a hard time believing the carbon date for LB1—just 18,000 years old—but further analysis would confirm this. “It is not so easy to think outside the known universe to the extent that was necessary with Liang Bua,” Brown confesses.

It took Brown months to decide if LB1 was human—if it deserved a place in the genus Homo. Its brain was smaller than that of the most primitive member of that clan. But intense discussion with colleagues eventually led Brown to dub the find Homo floresiensis. On 28 October 2004, “flo” made her official worldwide debut in the journal  Nature. A wee 30-year-old lady, wielding stone tools in a cave kitchen full of Stegodons, came to life on the pages of National Geographic, the Nepal Times and more than 100,000 web sites. Journalists jumped on her discoverers’ nickname: “Hobbit”. She even had large feet.

The sensation around hobbits caught Morwood off guard. “Normally the stakes in archaeology are pretty small,” he says. “It’s quite extraordinary to have the stakes get big. Suddenly the whole game changes.”

“I was the first to notice the pathology,” Maciej Henneberg tells me. The University of Adelaide anatomist is boarding a plane chartered for the Liang Bua field trip organized by hobbit skeptic Tueku Jacob. A radio reporter called Henneberg at 7 a.m. on the morning follow the release of the Nature paper, requesting feedback on the discovery in Flores. “I said ‘What discovery?’, then told her to call me back in an hour.” Henneberg read the paper online, and was immediately wary of Homo floresiensis. He diagnosed LB1 as a modern Homo sapiens with microcephaly, a disorder that cripples brain growth. Within hours his reaction hit the air waves.

Today it’s Henneberg who feels Brown came to hasty conclusions. “The whole problem is that people create species first, then compare them.” By now we’re winding through rice paddies in a chartered car, en route to the hobbit cave. I point to a pretty view, but Henneberg has no time for that. “People find a few bones, call it a new species and then it persists.”

“These things are much harder to undo,” adds Alan Thorne, a paleoanthropologist from Australian National University.

“It’s like elves,” nods Henneberg. “If you invent a story about elves, they persist in human memory and you can hear them everywhere in song. It’s nearly impossible to reject a hypothesis that has been built outside of a scientific framework.”

Thorne and Henneberg are co-authors with Jacob on a 2006 paper that says LB1 is a pygmy Homo sapiens of the Austromelanesian race (the group that includes Australian aboriginals). Thorne has compiled some 145 features that define Australian aboriginals and contends that “there isn’t a single feature that would exclude LB1 from that population.”

Later, when I pass along this claim to Peter Brown, his answer is blunt: “Are you familiar with the word ‘crap’?” Brown didn’t attend the symposium—he knew he’d find it infuriating. Over email he insists, “This is a complete fiction, which will become obvious in publications later this year.” Brown is working on a detailed description of the two Liang Bua mandibles recovered to date, and expects to revise classification of the Flores hominid. “I don’t think it’s Homo,” he says. “Certainly not Australopithecus.” Until publication, this is all he will reveal.

The 2006 paper from Jacob et al. also claims pathology. Using photos that mirror-image left and right halves of the skull, the authors say LB1 was deformed. But Dean Falk, a brain specialist at Florida State University, refutes that argument with quantitative analysis of a hobbit skull CT scan. And William Jungers, a lower limb expert from Stonybrook University, can’t help but laugh at the authors’ assessment of the Liang Bua femurs. Jacob’s team questions if LB1 walked with a limp—or walked at all—while Jungers questions if Jacob can properly line up bones. “One femur is missing its head so it rotates a bit more than the other when you lay it flat on the table,” he scoffs. “And they claim LB1 was the microcephalic!”

Microcephaly was a hot topic at Jacob’s symposium. Robert Martin from Chicago’s Field Museum repeated past concerns: “The brain of LB1 is simply too small to be explained by any normal arguments.” A specialist in body proportions, Martin pointed to geometric curves that plot brain size relative to body size for hominin species as well as the upward trend of brain size through time. LB1 sank to the bottom of the deep end on both plots. Chalking this up as an aberrant species, says Martin, calls for special pleading. He still sees LB1 as an aberrant individual.

Henneberg backs up Martin’s claim: “One of the criteria we use for determining paleopathology is falling out of normal distribution by more than three standard deviations.” LB1 falls out by four or five. Henneberg says this is due to stunted brain growth—microcephaly—a symptom of some 400 syndromes that he and his colleagues have tallied up.

Dean Falk says she doesn’t need 400 syndromes—just one in hand and she’d be convinced. “Find us one specimen that shows the same features as LB1 and the story’s over,” she told a symposium panel. “That’s all we ask.”

Falk’s presentation of brain case CT scans for LB1, microcephalics and healthy humans showed that LB1 is similar to a healthy human—its brain lacked distinctive microcephalic features —but also unique. She’s 100% certain it’s a new species. And while hobbit brains were small, her hunch is that they were well-organized. Enlarged temporal and frontal lobes on floresiensis suggest that she was a planner and an abstract thinker and maybe—just maybe—she could speak.

Bouncing to the end of the navigable road en route to the hobbit discovery site, our convoy of experts piled out of 14 cars and gathered on a narrow bridge. Morwood had organized seating arrangements for the journey and, as hoped, bloodshed amongst delegates had so far been averted. But now academic arch-enemies found themselves mulling about in dangerous proximity, unprotected by their PowerPoints. Morwood, himself, was on a collision course with Robert Eckhardt—the guy who’d accused him of “neutron bomb science”—when a band of little people saved the day. Local elders dressed in colorful sarongs and head scarfs burst into song and beckoned researchers to join their procession toward the cave.

Surely every visitor that day had seen pictures of Liang Bua. But no one—not even the most hardened hobbit-basher—could hide their humbled awe when they rounded a bend and first laid eyes on a gaping natural cathedral. The Liang Bua entrance is vast, yet somehow obscured by topography and tropical vegetation. As you penetrate it via a narrow path along a cliff face, the cave reveals itself to be vaster still, draped in stalactites, soft light and crisp, inviting air. There’s no denying that this would make a cozy hole for hobbits as well as hobbitologists. An area half the size of a football pitch allowed plenty of room for delegates to spread out, cluster in cliques and steal furtive glances at enemy camps. It was as awkward as a high school dance until the scene was swarmed by villagers and local officials gawking at the new arrivals.

The crush of people in the cave made it difficult to locate the archaeologists—Thomas Sutikna and crew. Though they had co-authored academic papers with many of that day’s visitors, few people would recognize them. In part, this was because the team had not been invited to Jacob’s symposium. Nor had they been officially informed of this visit. When I later asked Koeshardjono, Jacob’s right hand man who led the field trip, why the Liang Bua archaeologists weren’t included, he explained that they only invited “experts”. And so Sutikna, Wahyu Saptomo, Wasisto, Jatmiko and Rokhus stood over stone tools and Stegodon jaws sharing years of experience by way of ad hoc, one-on-one interpretation.

Most impressive to see were two deep shafts under excavation. Sector XII, at six meters depth, likely spans 100,000 years—the longest recent record anywhere in Southeast Asia. Use of shoring planks, platforms and ladders allows for the deep penetration of time, methods that Malay and Philippine symposium delegates will soon try at home.

The sheer walls of Section XII revealed a layer cake of deposits. The stand-out was an 11,000-year-old band of white ashy silt that the archaeologists claim divides the era of modern humans (above) and hobbits (below). Alas, no hominid bones were found at this hole, now hitting bedrock, but Stegodon bones and hundreds of stone tools were recovered.

As of this writing, the archaeologists place their hope in a second shaft, Section X. Modern human layers offered up a wealth of tools, including a manufacturing site. During the symposium visit, Sutikna and his team were just dipping through Section X’s ashy threshold, penetrating the Age of Hobbits. Working immediately adjacent to Sections VII and XI, where LB1 was recovered, feels auspicious. With luck, Sutikna will soon be re-packing his cherished suitcase.

As the crowds died down, I found the skeptical Alan Thorne in a quiet corner of the cave, enjoying a bit of a revelation. “The most significant thing—when you come to this site and you realize how big it is—it increases the chance that this is where it will be resolved. If they’re right,” he allowed, “the next cranium they find here will have a cranial capacity of 450cc.” Could Thorne be ready to believe in hobbits?

I returned to Liang Bua the next day with Mike Morwood and a film crew from Real Pictures. (Watch their film, Alien from Earth — it’s great!) It was Sunday, the archaeologists’ day of rest, and the cave was transformed—as serene, perhaps, as when hobbits had left it or when Morwood first visited in 1999.

One of Morwood’s first research questions back then was how people reached Australia. “Flores is important because it’s strategically located. It’s almost exactly halfway between the Asian continental area and the Australian continental area… an obvious migration route.” But Liang Bua told a story counter to what anyone might have guessed.

“Flores is an island where relic populations of very old lineages have survived until very recent times,” Morwood explains, citing Komodo dragons and Stegodons, the latter of which survived on Flores longer than anywhere else on Earth. Such relic populations, he contends, are evidence that modern humans were late arrivals here.

“All around the world,” says Morwood, “island faunas have become extinct fairly quickly when modern humans arrived.” Giant tortoises and dodos leap to mind. Further back, throughout the fossil record of Indonesia, Stegodons disappear right when modern humans appear. Liang Bua provides no exception—it marks a sharp Stegodon/modern human transition just 12,000 years ago. Morwood sees this as the most likely arrival date for Homo sapiens on the island. And since modern people reached Australia some 60,000 years ago, the implication is that they came to Flores from Australia, not the other way around. Australian colonization remains a great, unsolved mystery.

Morwood meanwhile points to a second, more dreadful implication of the faunal replacement at Liang Bua. “It looks like Homo floresiensis is also the survival of a very early hominid lineage that somehow hung out on this refuge island—an ‘island ark’—until just 12,000 years ago.” Proximity and time of death, he suggests, make our own species prime suspects for snuffing out the hobbits.

While the jury’s out on hobbits’ demise, Morwood sets his sights further afield. “If you look at the pattern of ocean currents,” he says, “almost certainly the source area for animals and early hominids coming to Flores is Sulawesi.” He waves north, toward a big island renowned for bizarre relic fauna, and his eyes light up. “We’ll probably have an endemic hominid species in Sulawesi,” he says. And that’s only the beginning. “We’re talking about thousands of islands in this area and hominid arrival in this area almost certainly before two million years ago. We may have hominid species appearing on a number of islands in Southeast Asia.”

This may be Morwood’s last field season at Liang Bua. He’s excited to see younger researchers cutting their teeth on a world-class archaeological site and even more excited to set off in search of Sulawesi’s proto-hobbits. But will he ever convince skeptics of Homo floresiensis?

“Frankly I don’t care!” Morwood’s voice booms through the ancient cave. “We’re talking about a small minority of people. There are people still out there that believe in a flat earth and if anybody wants to believe that Homo floresiensis is a pathological modern human, of Austromelanesian type, of dwarf stature related to the small people up the road, I have no problem with that. But the evidence is otherwise.”


Creative Commons License
Bones of Contention, © Djuna Ivereigh, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Excerpts may be reproduced with a credit to DjunaPix Indonesia Photography, linked to http://blog.djunapix.com/2010/05/wild/bones-of-contention/.

I love hobbits. Especially real ones.

Over the last few years I’ve followed the ongoing adventures of Flores hobbits – the meter-high humans who lived in a remote island cave some 100,000 to 17,000 years ago.

I’m sorry I missed hobbits in the flesh, but I’m also grateful to live in a time when their bones and stones are being unearthed, and when we can decipher so much about them.

And how great is it that so much of what hobbits have to say brings The Lord of the Rings to life? Flesh-and-blood hobbits were short, stout folk with big eyes and big feet, holed up in Middle Earth, fending off (Komodo) dragons and feasting on dwarf elephants that would have yielded second breakfasts, no doubt

Now enter modern-day wizards – a crack team of archaeologists, geologists and assorted experts pushing the envelopes on dating techniques, on the analysis of lithics and microbotanicals, and on the measurement of tiny bones that serve as bouncers to Club Modern Human. Hobbits didn’t make that cut, leading some to suspect that over a million years ago, proto-hobbits ventured off from African stock, and unlike Bilbo Baggins, never circled There and Back Again. They are the horseshoe crabs of the hominid tree – unstuck in time, relics of something akin to Tolkien’s “First Age”.

In the words of Christoph Zollikofer, expert on the 1.8 million-year-old Dmanisi fossils (the earliest known hominids outside of Africa, with a family resemblance to hobbits), “The hobbit shows us that science is not about answering questions, but about questioning answers. And the hobbit questions all supposed answers we have in paleoanthropology.”

Because that’s cool, I will be carving out some of this blogspace for hobbit news and views. First up…

My Flores Hobbit Archive – favorite shots now captioned, keyworded, and ready for high-res download. Editorial licensing of these images supports ongoing hobbitography and allows me to grant free academic use.

Some of my hobbitography has made it to print…

But most has not. Hobbits get a lot of press, but 9 times out of 10, editors fall back on a wire service shot of the hobbit skull. After that, hobbit fans might get to see the discovery cave from the only spot where it fits in one frame. Folks rarely get to lay eyes on studio-quality shots of bones and stone tools, on personal shots of researchers at work, on multi-flash shots of the inky depths where hobbits are dug. So… go have a look!

Every few months, news breaks on a fresh hobbit analysis. Beneath each of these stories run deep backstories – how data is recovered by digging, sifting and analyzing 200 cubic meters of sediment each field season, how new strategies help researchers deliver the longest Southeast Asian archaeological record to date, and how each new puzzle piece adds to the picture of Flores as a strange Middle Earth. I hope these images will inspire more tellings of such outlandish tales.

  • Favorite hobbit book: A New Human

    Mike Morwood and Penny van Oosterzee

    (I provided some photos.)
  • Favorite hobbit film: Alien from Earth

    Real Pictures, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, WGBH/NOVA

    (I provided stills and assisted with interviews at Liang Bua cave.)
  • Favorite hobbit story: How I Joined the Fellowship of Hobbits

    Matthew Tocheri

    (I’m a fan.)


Creative Commons License
I Love Hobbits, © Djuna Ivereigh, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Excerpts may be reproduced with a credit to DjunaPix Indonesia Photography, linked to http://blog.djunapix.com/2010/05/wild/i-love-hobbits/.